Compare / Laravel Telescope

Telescope, but for production, and connected.

Laravel Telescope is the debugger you already love locally. Unravel keeps that depth, runs safely against production, and ties the same signals into one causal trace, with history you can search.

The honest split

What Laravel Telescope does well, and where it stops.

Credit where it's due

Local debugging

What Telescope is good at

Telescope is the gold-standard local debugger for Laravel: requests, queries, jobs, cache, mail and more, captured on your machine while you develop. It's free, first-party, and indispensable for inspecting what your app did during a single local request. Nothing here replaces it on your laptop.

The gap it leaves

Unravel

Where Unravel goes further

Telescope wasn't built to run in production: it stores everything in your app's own database and ships with warnings about leaving it on under load, and its entries are flat lists where nothing connects one to the next. Unravel runs safely in production: events buffer off the critical path and ship after the response, with secrets scrubbed on your server. It keeps searchable history, and it links the request, its queries, the job it dispatched and the exception into one causal trace instead of separate lists you reassemble by eye.

At a glance

Laravel Telescope vs Unravel.

What each tool is built to do. Not a feature-checkbox race; the two answer different questions.

Where it runs
Laravel Telescope

Local / development, not for production

Unravel

Production, off the request's critical path

Storage
Laravel Telescope

Your app's own database

Unravel

Our cloud - no load on your DB

Structure
Laravel Telescope

Flat lists per signal

Unravel

One causal trace linking request → queries → jobs → exception

History
Laravel Telescope

Pruned locally; not meant to accumulate

Unravel

Searchable retained history, fingerprints and trends

AI agents
Laravel Telescope

-

Unravel

Claude Code / Cursor read the trace over MCP and fix it

Keep Telescope on your laptop for local development; that's still where it shines. Use Unravel for everything running in production, staging and CI workers, where Telescope can't safely go.

FAQ

The questions people actually ask.

Straight answers on how Unravel and Laravel Telescope compare.

Can I run Laravel Telescope in production?

It's not recommended. Telescope records into your application's own database and is designed for local development; leaving it on in production adds load and storage you have to manage, and Laravel's own docs steer you toward restricting it. Unravel is built specifically for production: capture runs off the critical path and stores in our cloud, not your database.

Is Unravel just Telescope for production?

It keeps Telescope's depth but adds the two things Telescope lacks: it's safe to run in production, and it connects signals into one causal trace (with history) instead of separate flat lists. So it's more than a hosted Telescope. It interprets the data: it detects N+1 clusters and attaches each exception to the trace that caused it.

Do I still need Telescope locally?

If you like Telescope for local development, keep it; Unravel doesn't replace your local workflow. The two are complementary: Telescope on your laptop, Unravel for production and other environments.

What does Unravel connect that Telescope leaves separate?

A queued job keeps the trace of the request that dispatched it, so a checkout and the email it queued are one story. Queries are normalized into fingerprints and N+1 clusters collapsed, and every failed trace carries its immediate cause: links Telescope's flat lists don't draw.

Stop reconstructing incidents from logs.

Connect your real app in two minutes. Free forever on a 3-day window, the full debugger included.

Start free